https://wiki.blender.jp/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Meta_talk%3AProposals%2FRestructuring_the_Manual 2026-11-05T09:02:38Z このウィキのこのページに関する変更履歴 MediaWiki 1.31.0 https://wiki.blender.jp/index.php?title=Meta_talk:Proposals/Restructuring_the_Manual&diff=43600&oldid=prev 2018-06-28T17:45:58Z

<p>1版 をインポートしました</p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <tr class="diff-title" lang="ja"> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← 古い版</td> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">2018年6月28日 (木) 17:45時点における版</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="ja"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(相違点なし)</div> </td></tr></table>

Yamyam https://wiki.blender.jp/index.php?title=Meta_talk:Proposals/Restructuring_the_Manual&diff=43599&oldid=prev 2009-02-21T17:30:06Z

<p><a href="/Meta_talk:Restructuring_the_Manual" class="mw-redirect" title="Meta talk:Restructuring the Manual">Meta talk:Restructuring the Manual</a> moved to <a href="/Meta_talk:Proposals/Restructuring_the_Manual" title="Meta talk:Proposals/Restructuring the Manual">Meta talk:Proposals/Restructuring the Manual</a>: move to Proposals/</p> <p><b>新規ページ</b></p><div>*All Caps Headers are not working in some languages, e.g. in german. <br /> *The Parts shouldn&#039;t be called just Part XX, but Part XX - Title. Mediawiki does provide some nice automatic linking (like &lt;nowiki&gt;[[../]]&lt;/nowiki&gt;), but it is not so usefull, if you get a link to Part XX without a title. <br /> *The Sections are imbalanced, e.g. &quot;Ambient Light&quot; would be quite short, &quot;Ray Shadow&quot; relatively long.<br /> *Some functionality needs an example, e.g. &#039;&#039;Stencil&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Warp&#039;&#039;. So a simple reference wouldn&#039;t be enough - or we need associated examples for the reference.<br /> --[[User:Soylentgreen|Soylentgreen]] 21:33, 6 November 2005 (CET)<br /> <br /> Right now, there&#039;s a list in the proposal that is pretty similar to the current manual, but that is not really what we are aiming for: The manual should be nothing more than a comprehensive quick start manual, so that means that there won&#039;t be in depth sections like described here. Those things will be covered in the reference guide, which becomes more important in the new proposal! --[[User:Ewout|Ewout]] 22:36, 6 November 2005 (CET)<br /> ::All right, should this be moved to the reference guide, or do we need a completely new structure? --[[User:Soylentgreen|Soylentgreen]] 22:52, 6 November 2005 (CET)<br /> <br /> <br /> The structure of the Users Manual is IMHO not too bad as a rough layout for a potential reference manual. It would be more task orientated than program-window orientated. But the sections would have to be more complete in explaining every button. --[[User:Soylentgreen|Soylentgreen]] 21:30, 7 November 2005 (CET)<br /> <br /> == Done! ==<br /> <br /> I&#039;ve pretty much done this as part of my information design/restructure project. I&#039;ll take this from the main page for now, and hopefully it will be put to rest for a while :) --[[User:Broken|Matt Ebb]] 13:29, 4 August 2006 (CEST)</div>

wiki>Mindrones