Doc talk:2.4/FAQ/Modelling/Mesh

Categorizing Mesh Modelling FAQ

As the amount of questions in this section grows it may be wise to find ways to split it to smaller sections for it to remain useable.

Currently there are some questions such as "What is a pole?" that would belong to Mesh Glossary for instance. Perhaps the current glossary could be branched for this. Whether FAQ and glossary should be crosslinked is an interesting question as well.

Also subsurf modelling might have its own sub FAQ. This because there are general questions related to mesh modeling and then there are more specific ones related especially to subsurf modelling.

--BeBraw 10:18, 13 December 2006 (CET)

"pole" example: This isn't really a frequently asked question (nobody directly askes this, but it's good to know), so i agree with moving this to the glossary.

In general: Splitting up the FAQ (and glossary) if it gets too big is a good idea. The glossary (e.g Manual.fr/Glossary aka Keywords) needs as much re-organisation as the FAQ IMO ... currently it's good, but rather bloated.

On a related note: we shoudl really include one or more extrernal search engines (such as google, altavista, yahoo etc...) - especially sicne the built-in seach function isn't anything near good. :-/

--Hoehrer 11:37, 13 December 2006 (CET)