Doc:2.6/Manual/Modeling/Metas/Editing

提供: wiki
< Doc:2.6‎ | Manual‎ | Modeling‎ | Metas
2013年7月11日 (木) 11:02時点におけるwiki>Mam711による版 (minor edits)
(差分) ← 古い版 | 最新版 (差分) | 新しい版 → (差分)
移動先: 案内検索

Editing Metas

When in Edit mode, the Active Element panel appears. These settings apply only to the selected meta element.

the active element panel.

Meta Shape

The Type menu lets you change the shape of the meta object, as explained above.


Stiffness

Together with Threshold, Stiffness controls the influencing range. While the threshold is common to all metas in the same object (or even the same object family), the stiffness is specific to each meta.

Scaling the inner green circle changes the Stiffness value. Stiffness defines how much the meta object is filled. This essentially defines how sensitive a meta is to being affected by other metas. With a low stiffness, the meta will begin to deform from further away. A higher value means the meta needs to be close to another one to begin merging.

When a Meta object comes within “range” of another meta, the two will begin to interact with each other. They don’t necessarily need to intersect, and depending on the Threshold and Stiffness settings, they most likely won’t need to. Stiffness is materialized by the green ring.

The range is from 0.0 to 10.0. But to be visible, the Stiffness must be slightly larger than the Threshold value. You can also visually adjust the Stiffness ring by using the RMB Template-RMB.png to select it and activate Scale mode with S.

Stiffness.

In (Stiffness), the meta ball labeled “A”, has a smaller Stiffness value than the one labeled “B”. As you can see, the green ring radius is different for each of them.

Negative Influence

Negative.

The opposite effect of a positive influence would be a negative influence: the objects repel each other. (Negative) shows a meta ball and a meta plane where the first is negative and the second, positive. Notice how the negative meta is not visible: only the surrounding circles appear. This is how Blender indicates that the object is negative.

Moving the sphere to the plane causes the plane’s mesh to “cave in” or collapse inward. If you move the plane away from the sphere, the plane’s mesh will restore itself.

To make a meta negative, just select the meta in edit mode, and check negative in the active element panel.

Hiding Elements

As in Object mode, you can hide the selected meta(s), and then reveal what was hidden. This is very handy for cleaning your views up a bit… Note that the two red and green rings always remain visible in Edit mode, as well as the select circle (in Object mode…).

To hide the current selection, use H, the Hide toggle button in the MetaBall tools, or the Metaball » Hide MetaElems » Hide Selected menu option.

To hide everything but the current selection, hit ⇧ ShiftH or use Metaball » Hide MetaElems » Hide Deselected.

To reveal what was hidden, use AltH, or the relevant option in the same Metaball » Hide MetaElems menu. You can also un-toggle the Hide button in the (MetaBall tools panel).

Deleting Elements

There is no Erase menu for metas, just a confirmation pop-up asking you if you want to delete the selected metas. Clear and simple!

Conversion

the convert menu

You can only convert metas to meshes, but here you have the option to keep the original Meta object (i.e. create a new Mesh one, instead of a “real” conversion…). Note that the resolution used for the new mesh is the Wiresize one, not the Rendersize one.

To convert the meta, press AltC in Object mode, and select mesh


Object Families

Meta objects have different behavior in Object mode than other object types – they can be “regrouped” into so-called “families”.

A “family” is a way to regroup several meta objects, producing something very similar to having several metas inside the same object.

A family is defined by the left part of an object’s name (the one before the dot). Remember, an object’s name is the one in the “OB” field, in most panels, not the “MB” field, which is the meta datablock’s name… For example, the family part of “MetaPlane.001” is “MetaPlane”. Each meta object in the same “family” is associated with one another as discussed below.

Meta ball base.

Families of metas are controlled by a base Meta object which is identified by an Object name without a right part. For example, if we have five metas called “MetaThing”, “MetaThing.001”, “MetaThing.002”, “MetaThing.003” and “MetaThing.004”, the base Meta object would be “MetaThing”.

The base Meta object determines the basis, the resolution, the threshold, and the transformations. It also has the material and texture area. The base meta is effectively the parent of (or perhaps a better word to use is “the owner of”) the other metas in the group (i.e. it is as if the other metas were “included” or joined into the base one).

Examples

(Meta ball base) shows the base meta labeled “B”. The other two Meta objects are children. Children’s selection rings are always black, while the group’s mesh is orange. Because the metas are grouped, they form a unified mesh which can always be selected by selecting the mesh of any meta in the group. For example, in the example (Meta ball base), only the lower sphere (the parent) has been selected, and you see that both the parent’s mesh and all of the children’s meshes are now highlighted.

Scaling the “base”.

The base Meta object controls the polygonalization (mesh structure) for the group, and as such, also controls the polygonalization for the children (non-base) metas. If we transform the base meta, the children’s polygonalization changes. However, if we transform the children, the polygonalization remains unchanged.

Hints

This discussion of “polygonization” doesn’t mean that the various meshes don’t deform towards or away from each other (meta objects always influence one another in the usual way, whether or not they are members of the same family). Rather, it means that the underlying mesh structure changes only when the base object transforms. For example, if you scale the base, the children’s mesh structure changes. In (Scaling the “base”), the base has been scaled down, which has the effect of scaling the mesh structure of each of the children. As you can see, the children’s mesh resolution has increased, while the base decreased. The children did not change size!